[PATCH] Provide Solaris 11 buildbots

[Sergio Durigan Junior]

On Friday, September 21 2018, Rainer Orth wrote:

> Hi Sergio,
>
>>>> There are two "special" tags: "MAIL" and "TEST".  When a builder is
>>>> marked as "MAIL", the BuildBot master will send e-mail notifications
>>>> about it to gdb-testers/gdb-patches.  If it's marked as "TEST", then all
>>>> e-mail notifications are supressed.  I just mark a builder as "TEST" if
>>>> it proves to unstable (i.e., when GDB fails to compile on it because of
>>>> some problem with the builder itself).  I think it makes sense to mark
>>>> your builders as "MAIL", since they're relatively stable, from what you
>>>> said.
>>>
>>> That's the intent: the hosts (global zones in Solaris lingo) are among
>>> my main (or only in case of the sparc box) development machines, so I'll
>>> keep them up and running for that reason alone ;-)
>>>
>>> The global zones are running current Solaris 11.5 Beta builds, and thus
>>> will be upgraded/rebooted biweekly.  The kernel zones which host the
>>> build slaves are on Solaris 11.4, with the intent of upgrading to the
>>> latest SRU (support repository upgrade; collection of patches tested
>>> together) once a month.  Apart from those planned downtimes (reboots in
>>> the order of minutes), the systems have been rock solid.
>>
>> Cool.  Reboots are fine, as long as (as you said below) the buildslaves
>> reconnect automatically.
>
> just FYI: I've now turned both buildslaves into Solaris SMF services,
> and they survived reboots.  So I believe we're set on that front.

Great!

> One question, though: the reboots (both host and kernel zones, which are
> VMs effectively) took longer than the current missing_timeout of 5
> minutes.  Would it be possible to double that or make it per-buildslave?

Sure, I doubled the time to 10 minutes now.

Thanks,

-- 
Sergio
GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF  31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36
Please send encrypted e-mail if possible
http://sergiodj.net/