Question: Is Dwarf CFI support required for new target?
Simon Marchi
simon.marchi@polymtl.ca
Wed May 30 19:04:00 GMT 2018
On 2018-05-29 12:14, Don Breazeal wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a question about the requirements for GDB port to a new target:
> is support for Dwarf Call Frame Information required for acceptance, or
> is prologue analysis sufficient?
> Thanks
> --Don
Hi Don,
Can you provide more context? I can interpret your question in two
ways:
- Your producer does not produce CFI, so you would be forced to always
use prologue analysis for unwinding. In that case, I guess it's fine,
GDB should do its best with the information at its disposal.
- Your producer produces CFI but GDB for your architecture won't use it.
In that case, I would ask why don't you use it. It's generally more
reliable and less hair-pulling than prologue analysis.
Simon
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list