[PATCH] gdbarch: Add pc_signed field and use it when adjusting BP addresses

[Vlad Ivanov]

15.03.2018, 15:59, "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>:
> If the address is already correct, why don't you simply set
> gdbarch_significant_addr_bit
> to 64 in the mips back-end instead of adding a new gdbarch routine?

That would affect address printing.  Moreover, semantically it's 
probably not a good practice because the code would imply that for 
all kind of MIPS all 64 bits of address are significant, whereas
in reality it differs from target to target.

Regards,

Vlad