[PATCHv4 2/2] gdb: Initial baremetal riscv support

[Yao Qi]

Andrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com> writes:

> +/* Read the MISA register from the target.  The register will only be read
> +   once, and the value read will be cached.  If the register can't be read
> +   from the target then a default value (0) will be returned.  If the

I don't understand the rationale that we maintain MISA register in a
per-inferior data.  Why don't we put it into regcache?  I know MISA
won't change, but it makes few sense to me to maintain register out of
regcache.

> +   pointer READ_P is not null, then the bool pointed to is updated  to
> +   indicate if the value returned was read from the target (true) or is the
> +   default (false).  */
> +
> +static uint32_t
> +riscv_read_misa_reg (bool *read_p)
> +{
> +  struct riscv_inferior_data *inf_data
> +    = riscv_inferior_data (current_inferior ());
> +
> +  if (!inf_data->misa_read && target_has_registers)
> +    {
> +      uint32_t value = 0;
> +      struct frame_info *frame = get_current_frame ();
> +
> +      TRY
> +	{
> +	  value = get_frame_register_unsigned (frame, RISCV_CSR_MISA_REGNUM);
> +	}
> +      CATCH (ex, RETURN_MASK_ERROR)
> +	{
> +	  /* Old cores might have MISA located at a different offset.  */
> +	  value = get_frame_register_unsigned (frame,
> +					       RISCV_CSR_LEGACY_MISA_REGNUM);
> +	}
> +      END_CATCH
> +
> +      inf_data->misa_read = true;
> +      inf_data->misa_value = value;
> +    }
> +
> +  if (read_p != nullptr)
> +    *read_p = inf_data->misa_read;
> +
> +  return inf_data->misa_value;
> +}

-- 
Yao (齐尧)