[PATCH v2 1/2] btrace: fix output of "set record btrace"
Markus Metzger
markus.t.metzger@intel.com
Mon Mar 5 10:59:00 GMT 2018
Instead of giving a message that "set record btrace" needs a sub-command,
GDB crashed. Fix it. A regression test comes with the next patch.
2018-03-05 Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
gdb/
* record-btrace.c (cmd_set_record_btrace): Print sub-commands.
---
gdb/record-btrace.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gdb/record-btrace.c b/gdb/record-btrace.c
index 48eda54..905f0c4 100644
--- a/gdb/record-btrace.c
+++ b/gdb/record-btrace.c
@@ -2953,7 +2953,10 @@ cmd_record_btrace_start (const char *args, int from_tty)
static void
cmd_set_record_btrace (const char *args, int from_tty)
{
- cmd_show_list (set_record_btrace_cmdlist, from_tty, "");
+ printf_unfiltered (_("\"set record btrace\" must be followed "
+ "by an apporpriate subcommand.\n"));
+ help_list (set_record_btrace_cmdlist, "set record btrace ",
+ all_commands, gdb_stdout);
}
/* The "show record btrace" command. */
--
1.8.3.1
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list