[PATCH v3 0/2] Make gdbserver work with filename-only binaries

Sergio Durigan Junior sergiodj@redhat.com
Thu Mar 1 17:37:00 GMT 2018


On Wednesday, February 28 2018, Joel Brobecker wrote:

>> Simon reminded me that this patch is also a good fit for the 8.1 branch,
>> so I went ahead and pushed it there.
>> 
>> 506817a3abd98859eb3474389e756c0253cc28a1
>> 2441702a72f324e41a1624dc042b334f375e2d81
>> 6d607b8812b35ff36fbbad2915696f6669f86a32
>
> Thanks for getting this through, Sergio and Simon.
>
> Just a quick reminder that, now that the .0 is out, all new patches
> pushed on the branch should have a corresponding PR number, with
> the target milestone set to 8.1. This is to be able to give users
> an actionable list of PRs they can look at if they are wondering
> what the difference between 8.0 and 8.1 is. Is there one for this
> issue? If not, it's good enough to create one after the fact, as
> long as the PR points to the various discussions and maybe gives
> the SHA1 of the various commits, I think we're good.

Hi Joel,

Sorry about this, I forgot about the need to create a PR when the
release is out.  There is no PR for this bug, so I created one following
the specifications:

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22907

Please let me know if there's something else I can do.

Thanks,

-- 
Sergio
GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF  31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36
Please send encrypted e-mail if possible
http://sergiodj.net/



More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list