[PATCH 2/2] btrace: set/show record btrace cpu

[Metzger, Markus T]

Hello Eli,

> > > > >   @cindex processor errata
> > > > >   @dfn{Processor errata} are bugs in processor firmware that can cause
> > > > >   a trace not to match the specification.  Trace decoders that are
> > > > >   unaware of these errata might fail to decode such a trace.
> > > > >   @value{GDBN} can detect erroneous trace packets and correct them,
> > > > >   thus avoiding the decoding failures.  These corrections are known as
> > > > >   @dfn{errata workarounds}, and are enabled based on the processor on
> > > > >   which the trace was recorded.
> > > >
> > > But that completely loses the explanation of what the errata are.
> > > If my explanation is not accurate, let's correct it, rather than deleting it.
> >
> > I didn't mean to delete your explanation.  I only removed the 'firmware' part.
> 
> The text I proposed is above.  It begins with an explanation of what those errata
> are, and why they are detrimental to btrace.  The text you proposed instead is
> this:
> 
>   Errata may cause the recorded trace to not match the specification.
>   This, in turn, may cause trace decode to fail.  @value{GDBN} can
>   detect erroneous trace packets and correct them, thus avoiding the
>   decoding failures.  These corrections are known as @dfn{errata
>   workarounds}, and are enabled based on the processor on which the
>   trace was recorded.
> 
> This just says that trace decode can fail, but tells nothing about the phenomenon
> itself.  Thus my "completely loses" reaction.
> 
> But I don't want to argue.  If you feel that the text you wrote is good enough, go
> ahead and push it, even though I'm unhappy.

I'd rather we find a wording we can all agree on.

I added that errata cause the trace to not match the spec and that this would
cause decode to fail.

I removed the bit about errata being in the firmware since that is not correct.

And I replaced "unaware decoders might fail to decode such a trace" with "This,
in turn, may cause trace decode to fail".

The rest I took as you suggested.

Where do you think we need to improve the wording?

Thanks,
Markus.

Intel Deutschland GmbH
Registered Address: Am Campeon 10-12, 85579 Neubiberg, Germany
Tel: +49 89 99 8853-0, www.intel.de
Managing Directors: Christin Eisenschmid, Christian Lamprechter
Chairperson of the Supervisory Board: Nicole Lau
Registered Office: Munich
Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 186928