New FAIL gdb.base/float128.exp on ppc64le [Re: [RFC v2][2/2] Target FP: Make use of MPFR if available]

[Jan Kratochvil]

On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 14:33:30 +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> A result of "inf" instead of the large number is exactly the problem that
> is fixed by using MPFR.  So I'm wondering: is the GDB that shows the FAIL
> actually built against MPFR?  If at build time MPFR was not detected,
> then this failure is exactly what you'd expect ...

Thanks for the heads up, our GDB build was really missing this dependency.

Still maybe the testcase should contain such explanation of the FAIL.
Moreover maybe it could be an XFAIL.


Thanks,
Jan