[PATCHv2 0/4] gdb: Allow struct fields named double
Andrew Burgess
andrew.burgess@embecosm.com
Tue Dec 18 22:40:00 GMT 2018
Simon, Tom,
Thanks for the feedback.
* Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> [2018-12-16 09:42:15 -0700]:
> >>>>> "Simon" == Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca> writes:
>
> Simon> This looks reasonable to me, from the user point of view there is not reason
> Simon> why x.double would be different from x.float. With the same logic, we should
> Simon> also allow x.int, x.short, etc. But I'm fine with doing it on an as-needed basis.
>
> See also https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13368
The new patch series includes a patch that extends some of the
comments in order to hopefully address this bug.
>
> Simon> This LGTM, with one thing below you might want to change. I'm far from an expert
> Simon> in parsers though, so please give others ~1 week to comment, and push then if you
> Simon> don't receive additional feedback.
>
> I think the main possible issue is if this introduces a new parser conflict.
> Taking a glance at the uses of "name" in the grammar, though, it seems
> safe enough.
I took a better look at how the YACC step of the compile works, and it
turns out that parser conflicts are not fatal to the build, and my
change had introduced a new conflict.
The new patch series addresses this by focusing my change specifically
on structure field names, so I want to be able to parse:
'object.double', but I don't expect to be able to parse an object
named 'double'. I also extended my patch to cover other types like
'int', 'short', etc.
As penance I've included a patch that tweaks how pointers are parsed
that resolves 49 reduce/reduce conflicts.
After this series there's still 42 shift/reduce conflicts, and 4
reduce/reduce conflicts in the C parser, but patch #4, the one I
really care about, doesn't introduce any new conflicts.
Tested on X86-64 GNU/Linux.
Thanks,
Andrew
---
Andrew Burgess (4):
gdb: Extend the comments in c-exp.y
gdb: Resolve 49 reduce/reduce conflicts in c-exp.y
gdb: Add new parser rule for structure field names
gdb: Allow struct fields named double
gdb/ChangeLog | 24 ++++
gdb/c-exp.y | 73 +++++++++---
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog | 5 +
gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-unusual-field-names.c | 32 +++++
.../gdb.dwarf2/dw2-unusual-field-names.exp | 132 +++++++++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 248 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-unusual-field-names.c
create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-unusual-field-names.exp
--
2.14.5
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list