PING: Re: [PATCHv5] gdb: Add default frame methods to gdbarch
Andrew Burgess
andrew.burgess@embecosm.com
Wed Dec 12 14:28:00 GMT 2018
Ping!
Thanks,
Andrew
* Andrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com> [2018-11-08 21:43:57 +0000]:
> This is another iteration of a patch that I last posted here:
>
> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2018-09/msg00127.html
>
> previous versions can be found here:
>
> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2018-06/msg00090.html
> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2018-03/msg00306.html
> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2018-03/msg00165.html
>
> I believe v4 actually got approved, but, when I went to merge it I
> realised I'd made a mistake!
>
> This new version is mostly the same as v4, but the default_unwind_pc
> method is simpler, but will, I think, still cover almost all targets.
>
> As far as testing, I don't believe that any target will be using these
> default methods after this initial commit, however, I did a build with
> all targets enabled, and it built fine.
>
> Out of tree I've tested this on the RISC-V target, with no regressions.
>
> Is this OK to apply?
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew
>
>
> ---
>
> Supply default gdbarch methods for gdbarch_dummy_id,
> gdbarch_unwind_pc, and gdbarch_unwind_sp. This patch doesn't actually
> convert any targets to use these methods, and so, there will be no
> user visible changes after this commit.
>
> The implementations for default_dummy_id and default_unwind_sp are
> fairly straight forward, these just take on the pattern used by most
> targets. Once these default methods are in place then most targets
> will be able to switch over.
>
> The implementation for default_unwind_pc is also fairly straight
> forward, but maybe needs some explanation.
>
> This patch has gone through a number of iterations:
>
> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2018-03/msg00165.html
> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2018-03/msg00306.html
> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2018-06/msg00090.html
> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2018-09/msg00127.html
>
> and the implementation of default_unwind_pc has changed over this
> time. Originally, I took an implementation like this:
>
> CORE_ADDR
> default_unwind_pc (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct frame_info *next_frame)
> {
> int pc_regnum = gdbarch_pc_regnum (gdbarch);
> return frame_unwind_register_unsigned (next_frame, pc_regnum);
> }
>
> This is basically a clone of default_unwind_sp, but using $pc. It was
> pointed out that we could potentially do better, and in version 2 the
> implementation became:
>
> CORE_ADDR
> default_unwind_pc (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct frame_info *next_frame)
> {
> struct type *type;
> int pc_regnum;
> CORE_ADDR addr;
> struct value *value;
>
> pc_regnum = gdbarch_pc_regnum (gdbarch);
> value = frame_unwind_register_value (next_frame, pc_regnum);
> type = builtin_type (gdbarch)->builtin_func_ptr;
> addr = extract_typed_address (value_contents_all (value), type);
> addr = gdbarch_addr_bits_remove (gdbarch, addr);
> release_value (value);
> value_free (value);
> return addr;
> }
>
> The idea was to try split out some of the steps of unwinding the $pc,
> steps that are on some (or many) targets no-ops, and so allow targets
> that do override these methods, to make use of default_unwind_pc.
>
> This implementation remained in place for version 2, 3, and 4.
>
> However, I realised that I'd made a mistake, most targets simply use
> frame_unwind_register_unsigned to unwind the $pc, and this throws an
> error if the register value is optimized out or unavailable. My new
> proposed implementation doesn't do this, I was going to end up
> breaking many targets.
>
> I considered duplicating the code from frame_unwind_register_unsigned
> that throws the errors into my new default_unwind_pc, however, this
> felt really overly complex. So, what I instead went with was to
> simply revert back to using frame_unwind_register_unsigned. Almost
> all existing targets already use this. Some of the ones that don't can
> be converted to, which means almost all targets could end up using the
> default.
>
> One addition I have made over the version 1 implementation is to add a
> call to gdbarch_addr_bits_remove. For most targets this is a no-op,
> but for a handful, having this call in place will mean that they can
> use the default method. After all this, the new default_unwind_pc now
> looks like this:
>
> CORE_ADDR
> default_unwind_pc (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct frame_info *next_frame)
> {
> int pc_regnum = gdbarch_pc_regnum (gdbarch);
> CORE_ADDR pc = frame_unwind_register_unsigned (next_frame, pc_regnum);
> pc = gdbarch_addr_bits_remove (gdbarch, pc);
> return pc;
> }
>
> gdb/ChangeLog:
>
> * gdb/dummy-frame.c (default_dummy_id): Defined new function.
> * gdb/dummy-frame.h (default_dummy_id): Declare new function.
> * gdb/frame-unwind.c (default_unwind_pc): Define new function.
> (default_unwind_sp): Define new function.
> * gdb/frame-unwind.h (default_unwind_pc): Declare new function.
> (default_unwind_sp): Declare new function.
> * gdb/frame.c (frame_unwind_pc): Assume gdbarch_unwind_pc is
> available.
> (get_frame_sp): Assume that gdbarch_unwind_sp is available.
> * gdb/gdbarch.c: Regenerate.
> * gdb/gdbarch.h: Regenerate.
> * gdb/gdbarch.sh: Update definition of dummy_id, unwind_pc, and
> unwind_sp. Add additional header files to be included in
> generated file.
> ---
> gdb/ChangeLog | 17 +++++++
> gdb/dummy-frame.c | 12 +++++
> gdb/dummy-frame.h | 6 +++
> gdb/frame-unwind.c | 20 ++++++++
> gdb/frame-unwind.h | 12 +++++
> gdb/frame.c | 132 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
> gdb/gdbarch.c | 41 ++++-------------
> gdb/gdbarch.h | 6 ---
> gdb/gdbarch.sh | 13 ++++--
> 9 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 115 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/dummy-frame.c b/gdb/dummy-frame.c
> index c6f874a3b19..8e380ae1c87 100644
> --- a/gdb/dummy-frame.c
> +++ b/gdb/dummy-frame.c
> @@ -385,6 +385,18 @@ const struct frame_unwind dummy_frame_unwind =
> dummy_frame_sniffer,
> };
>
> +/* See dummy-frame.h. */
> +
> +struct frame_id
> +default_dummy_id (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct frame_info *this_frame)
> +{
> + CORE_ADDR sp, pc;
> +
> + sp = get_frame_sp (this_frame);
> + pc = get_frame_pc (this_frame);
> + return frame_id_build (sp, pc);
> +}
> +
> static void
> fprint_dummy_frames (struct ui_file *file)
> {
> diff --git a/gdb/dummy-frame.h b/gdb/dummy-frame.h
> index 407f398404e..9eaec3492bf 100644
> --- a/gdb/dummy-frame.h
> +++ b/gdb/dummy-frame.h
> @@ -73,4 +73,10 @@ extern void register_dummy_frame_dtor (frame_id dummy_id,
> extern int find_dummy_frame_dtor (dummy_frame_dtor_ftype *dtor,
> void *dtor_data);
>
> +/* Default implementation of gdbarch_dummy_id. Generate a dummy frame_id
> + for THIS_FRAME assuming that the frame is a dummy frame. */
> +
> +extern struct frame_id default_dummy_id (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
> + struct frame_info *this_frame);
> +
> #endif /* !defined (DUMMY_FRAME_H) */
> diff --git a/gdb/frame-unwind.c b/gdb/frame-unwind.c
> index e6e63539ad7..fb0e5e83213 100644
> --- a/gdb/frame-unwind.c
> +++ b/gdb/frame-unwind.c
> @@ -193,6 +193,26 @@ default_frame_unwind_stop_reason (struct frame_info *this_frame,
> return UNWIND_NO_REASON;
> }
>
> +/* See frame-unwind.h. */
> +
> +CORE_ADDR
> +default_unwind_pc (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct frame_info *next_frame)
> +{
> + int pc_regnum = gdbarch_pc_regnum (gdbarch);
> + CORE_ADDR pc = frame_unwind_register_unsigned (next_frame, pc_regnum);
> + pc = gdbarch_addr_bits_remove (gdbarch, pc);
> + return pc;
> +}
> +
> +/* See frame-unwind.h. */
> +
> +CORE_ADDR
> +default_unwind_sp (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct frame_info *next_frame)
> +{
> + int sp_regnum = gdbarch_sp_regnum (gdbarch);
> + return frame_unwind_register_unsigned (next_frame, sp_regnum);
> +}
> +
> /* Helper functions for value-based register unwinding. These return
> a (possibly lazy) value of the appropriate type. */
>
> diff --git a/gdb/frame-unwind.h b/gdb/frame-unwind.h
> index af220f72a01..3ca3fdfe727 100644
> --- a/gdb/frame-unwind.h
> +++ b/gdb/frame-unwind.h
> @@ -70,6 +70,18 @@ enum unwind_stop_reason
> default_frame_unwind_stop_reason (struct frame_info *this_frame,
> void **this_cache);
>
> +/* A default unwind_pc callback that simply unwinds the register identified
> + by GDBARCH_PC_REGNUM. */
> +
> +extern CORE_ADDR default_unwind_pc (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
> + struct frame_info *next_frame);
> +
> +/* A default unwind_sp callback that simply unwinds the register identified
> + by GDBARCH_SP_REGNUM. */
> +
> +extern CORE_ADDR default_unwind_sp (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
> + struct frame_info *next_frame);
> +
> /* Assuming the frame chain: (outer) prev <-> this <-> next (inner);
> use THIS frame, and through it the NEXT frame's register unwind
> method, to determine the frame ID of THIS frame.
> diff --git a/gdb/frame.c b/gdb/frame.c
> index 4624eada87b..f98a54a9e0f 100644
> --- a/gdb/frame.c
> +++ b/gdb/frame.c
> @@ -872,76 +872,71 @@ frame_unwind_pc (struct frame_info *this_frame)
> {
> if (this_frame->prev_pc.status == CC_UNKNOWN)
> {
> - if (gdbarch_unwind_pc_p (frame_unwind_arch (this_frame)))
> + struct gdbarch *prev_gdbarch;
> + CORE_ADDR pc = 0;
> + int pc_p = 0;
> +
> + /* The right way. The `pure' way. The one true way. This
> + method depends solely on the register-unwind code to
> + determine the value of registers in THIS frame, and hence
> + the value of this frame's PC (resume address). A typical
> + implementation is no more than:
> +
> + frame_unwind_register (this_frame, ISA_PC_REGNUM, buf);
> + return extract_unsigned_integer (buf, size of ISA_PC_REGNUM);
> +
> + Note: this method is very heavily dependent on a correct
> + register-unwind implementation, it pays to fix that
> + method first; this method is frame type agnostic, since
> + it only deals with register values, it works with any
> + frame. This is all in stark contrast to the old
> + FRAME_SAVED_PC which would try to directly handle all the
> + different ways that a PC could be unwound. */
> + prev_gdbarch = frame_unwind_arch (this_frame);
> +
> + TRY
> {
> - struct gdbarch *prev_gdbarch;
> - CORE_ADDR pc = 0;
> - int pc_p = 0;
> -
> - /* The right way. The `pure' way. The one true way. This
> - method depends solely on the register-unwind code to
> - determine the value of registers in THIS frame, and hence
> - the value of this frame's PC (resume address). A typical
> - implementation is no more than:
> -
> - frame_unwind_register (this_frame, ISA_PC_REGNUM, buf);
> - return extract_unsigned_integer (buf, size of ISA_PC_REGNUM);
> -
> - Note: this method is very heavily dependent on a correct
> - register-unwind implementation, it pays to fix that
> - method first; this method is frame type agnostic, since
> - it only deals with register values, it works with any
> - frame. This is all in stark contrast to the old
> - FRAME_SAVED_PC which would try to directly handle all the
> - different ways that a PC could be unwound. */
> - prev_gdbarch = frame_unwind_arch (this_frame);
> -
> - TRY
> + pc = gdbarch_unwind_pc (prev_gdbarch, this_frame);
> + pc_p = 1;
> + }
> + CATCH (ex, RETURN_MASK_ERROR)
> + {
> + if (ex.error == NOT_AVAILABLE_ERROR)
> {
> - pc = gdbarch_unwind_pc (prev_gdbarch, this_frame);
> - pc_p = 1;
> + this_frame->prev_pc.status = CC_UNAVAILABLE;
> +
> + if (frame_debug)
> + fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog,
> + "{ frame_unwind_pc (this_frame=%d)"
> + " -> <unavailable> }\n",
> + this_frame->level);
> }
> - CATCH (ex, RETURN_MASK_ERROR)
> + else if (ex.error == OPTIMIZED_OUT_ERROR)
> {
> - if (ex.error == NOT_AVAILABLE_ERROR)
> - {
> - this_frame->prev_pc.status = CC_UNAVAILABLE;
> -
> - if (frame_debug)
> - fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog,
> - "{ frame_unwind_pc (this_frame=%d)"
> - " -> <unavailable> }\n",
> - this_frame->level);
> - }
> - else if (ex.error == OPTIMIZED_OUT_ERROR)
> - {
> - this_frame->prev_pc.status = CC_NOT_SAVED;
> -
> - if (frame_debug)
> - fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog,
> - "{ frame_unwind_pc (this_frame=%d)"
> - " -> <not saved> }\n",
> - this_frame->level);
> - }
> - else
> - throw_exception (ex);
> - }
> - END_CATCH
> + this_frame->prev_pc.status = CC_NOT_SAVED;
>
> - if (pc_p)
> - {
> - this_frame->prev_pc.value = pc;
> - this_frame->prev_pc.status = CC_VALUE;
> if (frame_debug)
> fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog,
> - "{ frame_unwind_pc (this_frame=%d) "
> - "-> %s }\n",
> - this_frame->level,
> - hex_string (this_frame->prev_pc.value));
> + "{ frame_unwind_pc (this_frame=%d)"
> + " -> <not saved> }\n",
> + this_frame->level);
> }
> + else
> + throw_exception (ex);
> + }
> + END_CATCH
> +
> + if (pc_p)
> + {
> + this_frame->prev_pc.value = pc;
> + this_frame->prev_pc.status = CC_VALUE;
> + if (frame_debug)
> + fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog,
> + "{ frame_unwind_pc (this_frame=%d) "
> + "-> %s }\n",
> + this_frame->level,
> + hex_string (this_frame->prev_pc.value));
> }
> - else
> - internal_error (__FILE__, __LINE__, _("No unwind_pc method"));
> }
>
> if (this_frame->prev_pc.status == CC_VALUE)
> @@ -2782,18 +2777,9 @@ get_frame_sp (struct frame_info *this_frame)
> {
> struct gdbarch *gdbarch = get_frame_arch (this_frame);
>
> - /* Normality - an architecture that provides a way of obtaining any
> - frame inner-most address. */
> - if (gdbarch_unwind_sp_p (gdbarch))
> - /* NOTE drow/2008-06-28: gdbarch_unwind_sp could be converted to
> - operate on THIS_FRAME now. */
> - return gdbarch_unwind_sp (gdbarch, this_frame->next);
> - /* Now things are really are grim. Hope that the value returned by
> - the gdbarch_sp_regnum register is meaningful. */
> - if (gdbarch_sp_regnum (gdbarch) >= 0)
> - return get_frame_register_unsigned (this_frame,
> - gdbarch_sp_regnum (gdbarch));
> - internal_error (__FILE__, __LINE__, _("Missing unwind SP method"));
> + /* NOTE drow/2008-06-28: gdbarch_unwind_sp could be converted to
> + operate on THIS_FRAME now. */
> + return gdbarch_unwind_sp (gdbarch, this_frame->next);
> }
>
> /* Return the reason why we can't unwind past FRAME. */
> diff --git a/gdb/gdbarch.c b/gdb/gdbarch.c
> index e2abf263b3a..f65af109b2e 100644
> --- a/gdb/gdbarch.c
> +++ b/gdb/gdbarch.c
> @@ -48,6 +48,8 @@
> #include "regcache.h"
> #include "objfiles.h"
> #include "auxv.h"
> +#include "frame-unwind.h"
> +#include "dummy-frame.h"
>
> /* Static function declarations */
>
> @@ -408,6 +410,7 @@ gdbarch_alloc (const struct gdbarch_info *info,
> gdbarch->ecoff_reg_to_regnum = no_op_reg_to_regnum;
> gdbarch->sdb_reg_to_regnum = no_op_reg_to_regnum;
> gdbarch->dwarf2_reg_to_regnum = no_op_reg_to_regnum;
> + gdbarch->dummy_id = default_dummy_id;
> gdbarch->deprecated_fp_regnum = -1;
> gdbarch->call_dummy_location = AT_ENTRY_POINT;
> gdbarch->code_of_frame_writable = default_code_of_frame_writable;
> @@ -427,6 +430,8 @@ gdbarch_alloc (const struct gdbarch_info *info,
> gdbarch->memory_insert_breakpoint = default_memory_insert_breakpoint;
> gdbarch->memory_remove_breakpoint = default_memory_remove_breakpoint;
> gdbarch->remote_register_number = default_remote_register_number;
> + gdbarch->unwind_pc = default_unwind_pc;
> + gdbarch->unwind_sp = default_unwind_sp;
> gdbarch->stabs_argument_has_addr = default_stabs_argument_has_addr;
> gdbarch->convert_from_func_ptr_addr = convert_from_func_ptr_addr_identity;
> gdbarch->addr_bits_remove = core_addr_identity;
> @@ -570,7 +575,7 @@ verify_gdbarch (struct gdbarch *gdbarch)
> if (gdbarch->register_name == 0)
> log.puts ("\n\tregister_name");
> /* Skip verify of register_type, has predicate. */
> - /* Skip verify of dummy_id, has predicate. */
> + /* Skip verify of dummy_id, invalid_p == 0 */
> /* Skip verify of deprecated_fp_regnum, invalid_p == 0 */
> /* Skip verify of push_dummy_call, has predicate. */
> /* Skip verify of call_dummy_location, invalid_p == 0 */
> @@ -609,8 +614,8 @@ verify_gdbarch (struct gdbarch *gdbarch)
> /* Skip verify of remote_register_number, invalid_p == 0 */
> /* Skip verify of fetch_tls_load_module_address, has predicate. */
> /* Skip verify of frame_args_skip, invalid_p == 0 */
> - /* Skip verify of unwind_pc, has predicate. */
> - /* Skip verify of unwind_sp, has predicate. */
> + /* Skip verify of unwind_pc, invalid_p == 0 */
> + /* Skip verify of unwind_sp, invalid_p == 0 */
> /* Skip verify of frame_num_args, has predicate. */
> /* Skip verify of frame_align, has predicate. */
> /* Skip verify of stabs_argument_has_addr, invalid_p == 0 */
> @@ -954,9 +959,6 @@ gdbarch_dump (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct ui_file *file)
> fprintf_unfiltered (file,
> "gdbarch_dump: dtrace_probe_is_enabled = <%s>\n",
> host_address_to_string (gdbarch->dtrace_probe_is_enabled));
> - fprintf_unfiltered (file,
> - "gdbarch_dump: gdbarch_dummy_id_p() = %d\n",
> - gdbarch_dummy_id_p (gdbarch));
> fprintf_unfiltered (file,
> "gdbarch_dump: dummy_id = <%s>\n",
> host_address_to_string (gdbarch->dummy_id));
> @@ -1440,15 +1442,9 @@ gdbarch_dump (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct ui_file *file)
> fprintf_unfiltered (file,
> "gdbarch_dump: type_align = <%s>\n",
> host_address_to_string (gdbarch->type_align));
> - fprintf_unfiltered (file,
> - "gdbarch_dump: gdbarch_unwind_pc_p() = %d\n",
> - gdbarch_unwind_pc_p (gdbarch));
> fprintf_unfiltered (file,
> "gdbarch_dump: unwind_pc = <%s>\n",
> host_address_to_string (gdbarch->unwind_pc));
> - fprintf_unfiltered (file,
> - "gdbarch_dump: gdbarch_unwind_sp_p() = %d\n",
> - gdbarch_unwind_sp_p (gdbarch));
> fprintf_unfiltered (file,
> "gdbarch_dump: unwind_sp = <%s>\n",
> host_address_to_string (gdbarch->unwind_sp));
> @@ -2307,13 +2303,6 @@ set_gdbarch_register_type (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
> gdbarch->register_type = register_type;
> }
>
> -int
> -gdbarch_dummy_id_p (struct gdbarch *gdbarch)
> -{
> - gdb_assert (gdbarch != NULL);
> - return gdbarch->dummy_id != NULL;
> -}
> -
> struct frame_id
> gdbarch_dummy_id (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct frame_info *this_frame)
> {
> @@ -3046,13 +3035,6 @@ set_gdbarch_frame_args_skip (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
> gdbarch->frame_args_skip = frame_args_skip;
> }
>
> -int
> -gdbarch_unwind_pc_p (struct gdbarch *gdbarch)
> -{
> - gdb_assert (gdbarch != NULL);
> - return gdbarch->unwind_pc != NULL;
> -}
> -
> CORE_ADDR
> gdbarch_unwind_pc (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct frame_info *next_frame)
> {
> @@ -3070,13 +3052,6 @@ set_gdbarch_unwind_pc (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
> gdbarch->unwind_pc = unwind_pc;
> }
>
> -int
> -gdbarch_unwind_sp_p (struct gdbarch *gdbarch)
> -{
> - gdb_assert (gdbarch != NULL);
> - return gdbarch->unwind_sp != NULL;
> -}
> -
> CORE_ADDR
> gdbarch_unwind_sp (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct frame_info *next_frame)
> {
> diff --git a/gdb/gdbarch.h b/gdb/gdbarch.h
> index 2cb69610837..e8063922725 100644
> --- a/gdb/gdbarch.h
> +++ b/gdb/gdbarch.h
> @@ -380,8 +380,6 @@ typedef struct type * (gdbarch_register_type_ftype) (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, in
> extern struct type * gdbarch_register_type (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, int reg_nr);
> extern void set_gdbarch_register_type (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, gdbarch_register_type_ftype *register_type);
>
> -extern int gdbarch_dummy_id_p (struct gdbarch *gdbarch);
> -
> typedef struct frame_id (gdbarch_dummy_id_ftype) (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct frame_info *this_frame);
> extern struct frame_id gdbarch_dummy_id (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct frame_info *this_frame);
> extern void set_gdbarch_dummy_id (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, gdbarch_dummy_id_ftype *dummy_id);
> @@ -622,14 +620,10 @@ extern void set_gdbarch_fetch_tls_load_module_address (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
> extern CORE_ADDR gdbarch_frame_args_skip (struct gdbarch *gdbarch);
> extern void set_gdbarch_frame_args_skip (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, CORE_ADDR frame_args_skip);
>
> -extern int gdbarch_unwind_pc_p (struct gdbarch *gdbarch);
> -
> typedef CORE_ADDR (gdbarch_unwind_pc_ftype) (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct frame_info *next_frame);
> extern CORE_ADDR gdbarch_unwind_pc (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct frame_info *next_frame);
> extern void set_gdbarch_unwind_pc (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, gdbarch_unwind_pc_ftype *unwind_pc);
>
> -extern int gdbarch_unwind_sp_p (struct gdbarch *gdbarch);
> -
> typedef CORE_ADDR (gdbarch_unwind_sp_ftype) (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct frame_info *next_frame);
> extern CORE_ADDR gdbarch_unwind_sp (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct frame_info *next_frame);
> extern void set_gdbarch_unwind_sp (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, gdbarch_unwind_sp_ftype *unwind_sp);
> diff --git a/gdb/gdbarch.sh b/gdb/gdbarch.sh
> index bbfa8d22058..96afb01c098 100755
> --- a/gdb/gdbarch.sh
> +++ b/gdb/gdbarch.sh
> @@ -480,7 +480,12 @@ m;const char *;register_name;int regnr;regnr;;0
> # use "register_type".
> M;struct type *;register_type;int reg_nr;reg_nr
>
> -M;struct frame_id;dummy_id;struct frame_info *this_frame;this_frame
> +# Generate a dummy frame_id for THIS_FRAME assuming that the frame is
> +# a dummy frame. A dummy frame is created before an inferior call,
> +# the frame_id returned here must match the base address returned by
> +# gdbarch_push_dummy_call and the frame's pc must match the dummy
> +# frames breakpoint address.
> +m;struct frame_id;dummy_id;struct frame_info *this_frame;this_frame;;default_dummy_id;;0
> # Implement DUMMY_ID and PUSH_DUMMY_CALL, then delete
> # deprecated_fp_regnum.
> v;int;deprecated_fp_regnum;;;-1;-1;;0
> @@ -596,8 +601,8 @@ m;int;remote_register_number;int regno;regno;;default_remote_register_number;;0
> F;CORE_ADDR;fetch_tls_load_module_address;struct objfile *objfile;objfile
> #
> v;CORE_ADDR;frame_args_skip;;;0;;;0
> -M;CORE_ADDR;unwind_pc;struct frame_info *next_frame;next_frame
> -M;CORE_ADDR;unwind_sp;struct frame_info *next_frame;next_frame
> +m;CORE_ADDR;unwind_pc;struct frame_info *next_frame;next_frame;;default_unwind_pc;;0
> +m;CORE_ADDR;unwind_sp;struct frame_info *next_frame;next_frame;;default_unwind_sp;;0
> # DEPRECATED_FRAME_LOCALS_ADDRESS as been replaced by the per-frame
> # frame-base. Enable frame-base before frame-unwind.
> F;int;frame_num_args;struct frame_info *frame;frame
> @@ -1670,6 +1675,8 @@ cat <<EOF
> #include "regcache.h"
> #include "objfiles.h"
> #include "auxv.h"
> +#include "frame-unwind.h"
> +#include "dummy-frame.h"
>
> /* Static function declarations */
>
> --
> 2.14.5
>
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list