ezmlm warning

Mon Oct 30 00:16:00 GMT 2017

Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list.

Messages to you from the gdb-patches mailing list seem to
have been bouncing. I've attached a copy of the first bounce
message I received.

If this message bounces too, I will send you a probe. If the probe bounces,
I will remove your address from the gdb-patches mailing list,
without further notice.

I've kept a list of which messages from the gdb-patches mailing list have 
bounced from your address.

Copies of these messages may be in the archive.
To retrieve a set of messages 123-145 (a maximum of 100 per request),
send an empty message to:
   <gdb-patches-get.123_145@sourceware.org>

To receive a subject and author list for the last 100 or so messages,
send an empty message to:
   <gdb-patches-index@sourceware.org>

Here are the message numbers:

   142671

--- Enclosed is a copy of the bounce message I received.

Return-Path: <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Received: (qmail 113851 invoked by uid 89); 17 Oct 2017 15:41:06 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Checked: by ClamAV 0.99.2 on sourceware.org
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:796
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on sourceware.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-HELO: mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com
Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (HELO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com) (148.163.158.5)
 by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 15:41:04 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1])
	by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v9HFeRWx022673
	for <gdb-patches-return-142671-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 11:41:03 -0400
Received: from e06smtp12.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp12.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.108])
	by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2dnk895f32-1
	(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
	for <gdb-patches-return-142671-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 11:41:02 -0400
Received: from localhost
	by e06smtp12.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted
	for <gdb-patches-return-142671-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org> from <uweigand@de.ibm.com>;
	Tue, 17 Oct 2017 16:41:00 +0100
Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.196)
	by e06smtp12.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.142) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted;
	Tue, 17 Oct 2017 16:40:57 +0100
Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58])
	by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id v9HFev2P27066444
	for <gdb-patches-return-142671-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 15:40:57 GMT
Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
	by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB3964C044
	for <gdb-patches-return-142671-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 16:36:45 +0100 (BST)
Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
	by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7DFB4C040
	for <gdb-patches-return-142671-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 16:36:45 +0100 (BST)
Received: from oc3748833570.ibm.com (unknown [9.167.243.191])
	by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	for <gdb-patches-return-142671-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 16:36:45 +0100 (BST)
Received: by oc3748833570.ibm.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id CA29CD807C2; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 17:40:56 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: [RFA 1/6] Use std::vector in end_symtab_get_static_block
To: gdb-patches-return-142671-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org (Tom Tromey)
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 17:40:56 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <874lqyu53w.fsf@tromey.com> from "Tom Tromey" at Oct 16, 2017 03:58:59 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
x-cbid: 17101715-0008-0000-0000-000004A0B8B5
X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused
x-cbparentid: 17101715-0009-0000-0000-00001E3301BB
Message-Id: <20171017154056.CA29CD807C2@oc3748833570.ibm.com>
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2017-10-17_11:,,
 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0
 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam
 adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1707230000
 definitions=main-1710170220

Tom Tromey wrote:
> >>>>> "Simon" == Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@ericsson.com> writes:
> 
> Simon> That made me doubt for a second, since we're more used to see "<"
> Simon> in these functions.  I then saw that block_compar did sort them
> Simon> in descending order.  Could you add a comment here to indicate that?
> 
> Done, thanks.

This commit causes many regressions in the inline-cmds.exp test case
for me.  Interestingly enough, when I change the std::sort to a
std::stable_sort, those regressions go away.  Not sure exactly why
this would be the case; but with inline functions multiple blocks
at the same address may actually occur ...

Bye,
Ulrich

-- 
  Dr. Ulrich Weigand
  GNU/Linux compilers and toolchain
  Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com