[pushed] gdb.base/watch-cond-infcall.exp: Don't run if target doesn't support infcalls

Simon Marchi simon.marchi@ericsson.com
Tue May 30 09:29:00 GMT 2017


FYI, I pushed this as obvious.

This test requires calling a function in the inferior, and therefore it
doesn't make sense to run it if the target doesn't support calling
functions from GDB.

gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* gdb.base/watch-cond-infcall.exp: Don't run if target doesn't
	support function calls from GDB.
---
 gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog                       | 5 +++++
 gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/watch-cond-infcall.exp | 5 +++++
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
index c16f201..cb1d8ec 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2017-05-30  Simon Marchi  <simon.marchi@ericsson.com>
+
+	* gdb.base/watch-cond-infcall.exp: Don't run if target doesn't
+	support function calls from GDB.
+
 2017-05-21  Tom Tromey  <tom@tromey.com>
 
 	PR rust/21466:
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/watch-cond-infcall.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/watch-cond-infcall.exp
index c2d9669..df3b19d 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/watch-cond-infcall.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/watch-cond-infcall.exp
@@ -18,6 +18,11 @@
 
 standard_testfile
 
+if [target_info exists gdb,cannot_call_functions] {
+    unsupported "can not call functions"
+    return
+}
+
 if { [build_executable ${testfile}.exp ${testfile} ${testfile}.c {debug}] } {
     untested "failed to compile"
     return -1
-- 
2.7.4



More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list