[musl] Re: [PATCH] Fix invalid sigprocmask call
Pedro Alves
palves@redhat.com
Fri Mar 24 15:52:00 GMT 2017
On 03/24/2017 03:35 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
> If you file a report and it's deemed a bug in the standard and
> changed, I'm happy to change this on the musl side. Just keep me
> posted on what happens.
Keep me posted as well.
> I don't have any preference on what the
> behavior "should" be here (IMO imposing a behavior when the caller has
> violated constraints like passed a wrong value for how is pointless
> anyway) but I do want to conform to the standard.
IMO, no constrains were violated.
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list