[RFA 08/10] Move some code later in backtrace_command_1
Pedro Alves
palves@redhat.com
Tue Jun 27 17:18:00 GMT 2017
On 04/25/2017 08:41 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
> PR backtrace/15584 notes that some code in backtrace_command_1 is not
> useful when frame filters are in use.
Doesn't the "info verbose on" bit affect frame filters too?
Particularly the:
"Need to do this in a
separate pass so that "Reading in symbols for xxx" messages
don't screw up the appearance of the backtrace."
... remark.
Not sure I fully understand whether that "info verbose" code
makes sense nowadays, though. It doesn't seem to be documented
in the manual.
In any case, if you need that, then I guess it'd be done
somewhere inside the frame filters code, I suppose?
With that in mind, this LGTM.
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list