[PATCH v4] gdb: ADI support

[Jose E. Marchesi]

    > +/* Per-process ADI stat info.  */
    > +
    > +struct sparc64_adi_info
    > +{
    > +  /* The process identifier.  */
    > +  pid_t pid;
    > +
    > +  /* The ADI stat.  */
    > +  struct adi_stat_t stat;
    > +
    > +  /* Linked list.  */
    > +  struct sparc64_adi_info *next;
    > +};
    
    Use C++ STL list.  I suggested it on the v3 review.

General question: what's wrong with using a simple linked list of
structs if that is the developer's preference, and/or it follows the
current style of the surrounding code?  (Not saying it is in this case,
that's up to Weimin to say.)

As far as I can see the usage of STL is not mandated by the GDB coding
standards (as documented in the wiki) and developers may want to avoid
them in many circumstances.