[RFA 1/5] Remove some ui_out-related cleanups from Python
Tom Tromey
tom@tromey.com
Wed Feb 8 23:05:00 GMT 2017
>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> writes:
Pedro> One difficulty with putting such a thing at the top level is that
Pedro> gdb relies on gnulib headers (that exist under gdb/) while
Pedro> other toolchain components don't, yet, at least.
gnulib should just be at top-level, but I realize that's a pain.
Pedro> It probably does make sense to start with something simpler and
Pedro> upgrade when/if we find a need. OTOH, looks like the current patch
Pedro> doesn't have accessors for the wrapped value, so it seems like we'll
Pedro> at least need to be extend it in that direction in no time.
I had forgotten about this code. I don't mind using it instead.
Pedro> Patch LGTM with Trevor's and Simon's nits addressed.
I have that done locally, but I've just been waiting until your series
lands, so I can rebase. And then maybe the option stuff wouldn't be
needed anyway? I don't remember the details from your branch, I was
just waiting for the big rebase to find out.
Tom
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list