[PATCH v3 1/4] reggroups: Add test and docs for `info reg $reggroup` feature

Eli Zaretskii eliz@gnu.org
Thu Dec 21 03:40:00 GMT 2017

> Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 21:40:10 -0500
> From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
> Cc: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
>         openrisc@lists.librecores.org
> >> +@code{maint print reggroups}.
> > 
> > Please add here a cross-reference to the node where "maint print
> > reggroups" is described.
> Is it ok for a non-maint command to refer to a maint command?


> AFAIK, we don't expect an average user to have to use maintenance
> commands when using GDB.  So maybe "maint print reggroups" should be
> promoted to a non-maint command (e.g. info register-groups)?

Registers are not for the average user anyway, so I don't see a
problem here.

More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list