[PATCH v2] Implement pahole-like 'ptype /o' option
Tue Dec 12 01:25:00 GMT 2017
On 2017-12-11 19:51, Pedro Alves wrote:
>>> So from that angle, I see value in not printing the offsets
>>> of union members.
>> Since it's still not clear whether the offsets should be printed or
>> in this case, and I am not a global maintainer, I adjusted the code to
>> print them and will post the patch as a reply to the v4 e-mail. This
>> way you can decide which version is best.
> Fun, just when I agreed with not printing the offsets... :-P :-)
Damn, sorry for starting you guys on that track! I just wanted to know
if it was intentional or not, I am fine with either.
More information about the Gdb-patches