[pushed] Update GDB's list of maintainers to reflect today's reality

[Yao Qi]

Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> writes:

> -	m68hc11		--target=m68hc11-elf ,-Werror ,
> -			Stephane Carrez		Stephane.Carrez@gmail.com
> -
>  	m68k		--target=m68k-elf ,-Werror
>  
>  	m88k		--target=m88k-openbsd ,-Werror
> @@ -306,9 +300,6 @@ the native maintainer when resolving ABI issues.
>  	s390		--target=s390-linux-gnu ,-Werror
>  			Andreas Arnez		arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com
>  
> -	score	--target=score-elf
> -			Qinwei		qinwei@sunnorth.com.cn
> -
>  	sh		--target=sh-elf ,-Werror
>  			--target=sh64-elf ,-Werror
>  
> @@ -327,9 +318,6 @@ the native maintainer when resolving ABI issues.
>  
>  	x86-64		--target=x86_64-linux-gnu ,-Werror
>  
> -	xstormy16	--target=xstormy16-elf
> -			Corinna Vinschen	vinschen@redhat.com
> -

Hi Joel,
Some gdb build scripts gdb_buildall.sh and gdb_mbuild.sh parse
MAINTAINERS file to build gdb for each port.  With your patch applied,
the scripts won't build gdb for these ports, is it intended?  I am not
aware of other people using gdb_buildall.sh and gdb_mbuild.sh to build
gdb for different ports but I still use it from time to time.  To be
clear, I don't mind stopping building them.

-- 
Yao (齐尧)