[RFA] Remove save_inferior_ptid

Pedro Alves palves@redhat.com
Fri Aug 18 10:28:00 GMT 2017


On 08/18/2017 03:23 AM, Tom Tromey wrote:
>>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> writes:
> 
> Pedro> Did you try that?  Patch #1 below runs regression free here.  How about
> Pedro> putting that in first, avoiding reindenting the big block around twice?
> 
> I didn't think of it, but I ran this through the buildbot and it seems fine.
> 
> Pedro> That leaves linux_get_siginfo_data.  Since this is a local
> Pedro> static function, it's easy to pass the thread as argument, pushing
> Pedro> the inferior_ptid switching further down.  See attached patch #2.
> Pedro> WDYT?
> 
> Good idea.
> 
> Here's the new patch.

LGTM.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves



More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list