[rfc] PR 20569, segv in follow_exec

Pedro Alves palves@redhat.com
Fri Oct 21 18:33:00 GMT 2016


On 10/21/2016 07:30 PM, Luis Machado wrote:

> How does the test (and patch) look now?

Did the code change compared to Sandra's version?  You mentioned
some issue previously.  It'd be great for review if
the git log / rationale were re-included/updated.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves



More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list