[PING] RE: [RFC][PATCH] - Fix pretty-printers which call the inferiors, mi-interface crashs

Pedro Alves palves@redhat.com
Tue Oct 4 17:41:00 GMT 2016


Hi there,

Sorry for the delay.  Thanks much for digging in and writing
the patch.  It'd be really great if we could have a testcase in
the testsuite to exercise this.  That'd help move the patch along,
and, it'd make sure we don't regress again in the future.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves

On 06/27/2016 03:35 PM, Vörtler, Thilo wrote:
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: Vörtler, Thilo
>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. Juni 2016 11:09
>> An: 'gdb-patches@sourceware.org' <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
>> Betreff: [RFC][PATCH] - Fix pretty-printers which call the inferiors, mi-
>> interface crashs
>>
>> Hi,
>> as described in Bug 17437 the mi interface corrupts cached frames in the
>> list_arg_or_local function of mi-cmd-stack.c when a pretty-printer calls a
>> function of the inferior. To prevent this the frame_id is stored and used to
>> restore the frame after calling list_arg_or_local
>> - MI regressions were run and no effect through the patch was seen
>>
>> Is this patch okay?
>>
>> BR, Thilo
>>
>>
>> gdb/ChangeLog:
>>
>> 2016-06-02  Thilo Vörtler  <thilo.voertler@coseda-tech.com>
>>
>> 	* mi-cmd-stack.c (list_args_or_locals) the mi interface corrupts
>> 	cached frames in the list_arg_or_local function of mi-cmd-stack.c
>> when
>> 	a pretty-printer calls a function of the inferior. To prevent this the
>> 	frame_id is stored and used to restore the frame after calling
>> 	list_arg_or_local



More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list