[PATCH, doc RFA] Remove support for "target m32rsdi" and "target mips/pmon/ddb/rockhopper/lsi"

[Pedro Alves]

On 03/22/2016 10:48 AM, Yao Qi wrote:
> Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> writes:
> 
>> Ref: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2016-03/msg00004.html
>>
>> This removes support for:
>>
>>   | target            | source                |
>>   |-------------------+-----------------------|
>>   | target m32rsdi    | gdb/remote-m32r-sdi.c |
>>   | target mips       | gdb/remote-mips.c     |
>>   | target pmon       | gdb/remote-mips.c     |
>>   | target ddb        | gdb/remote-mips.c     |
>>   | target rockhopper | gdb/remote-mips.c     |
>>   | target lsi        | gdb/remote-mips.c     |
>>
>> That is:
>>
>>   - Remote M32R debugging over SDI.
>>
>>   - Debugging boards using the MIPS remote debugging protocol
>>     over a serial line, PMON, and a few variants.
>>
>> These are the last non-"target remote" remote targets in the tree, if
>> you don't count "target sim".
> 
> I am OK on this, but I'd like to hear what does Maciej (cc'ed) think.

Good idea.

FWIW, I didn't think this would affect MIPS in any way, given that
I couldn't find a single bug report for any of these targets in
bugzilla.  I don't mean open bugs, I mean, any, ever, other than
build failure issues.  I don't recall anyone mentioning anything
related to these targets on the gdb or gdb-patches lists, ever,
either.  It seems like google searches for these targets only hit
the gdb documentation, and my suggestion to remove them on
the gdb@ list [1].  :-)

Also, I thought of MIPS's earlier focus on MDI, and knowing that
even that one was pushed out of tree years ago, my thinking was
that the risk of this affecting anyone in practice
approximates zero.

[1] - https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2016-03/msg00004.html

Thanks,
Pedro Alves