[PATCH] Improve analysis of racy testcases

[Pedro Alves]

On 03/14/2016 12:31 PM, Antoine Tremblay wrote:

> Just to let know you that the script worked as expected during my
> testing and it's quite nice to see. The tests however were more flacky
> then expected so I can't use the output directly guess I'll need a never
> ignore this test list... (like base/break.exp). Still it's very helpful.

Could you share a bit more on what you found?  I wouldn't expect break.exp
to be flaky.  I think some tests that use gdb_test_stdio are still
flaky with gdbserver, but break.exp does not seem to use it.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves