[PATCH v3] Optimize memory_xfer_partial for remote
Pedro Alves
pedro@palves.net
Thu Jun 30 23:44:00 GMT 2016
On 06/30/2016 11:40 PM, Don Breazeal wrote:
> Hi Pedro,
> Here is v3 of the patch. Differences from v2 include returning
> ULONGEST_MAX instead of 4096 from the default target function
> and using TARGET_DEFAULT_RETURN instead of TARGET_DEFAULT_FUNCTION
> in the definition of to_get_memory_xfer_limit.
>
> I re-ran the testsuite with native and native-gdbserver and saw no
> regressions. I also verified that the behavior of the memory transfers
> was as expected for the remote and native targets.
>
> Does this one look good-to-go?
Yes, looks good.
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list