[PATCH] Remote debugging without a binary (regression)
Pedro Alves
palves@redhat.com
Fri Feb 12 15:29:00 GMT 2016
On 02/11/2016 02:19 PM, Luis Machado wrote:
> gdb/ChangeLog:
>
> 2016-02-11 Luis Machado <lgustavo@codesourcery.com>
>
> * remote.c (remote_add_inferior): Guard block that can throw
> errors.
So the question is: why guard this call, and not the others?
E.g., I'd think that failing to find the executable in the sysroot
shouldn't error out of "attach" either.
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list