[PATCH] value: Make accessor methods' parameters const-correct

[Martin Galvan]

On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
> Const on pointer parameters is certainly useful.  But since you asked
> me [ :-) ], I'm on the "const on value params is mostly useless
> clutter" camp.  It's something you don't see many style guides requiring,
> and it's something gdb hasn't been doing either.
>
> So personally I'd prefer a patch without those bits.

No problem, I'll remove them. Can I commit the patch after I do it, or
should I send in a v2 first?