[PATCH, FT32] gdb and sim support

[Joel Brobecker]

> > Doesn't the sim need that header too - I would think the point of
> > having the definitions be there would be to make sure that sim and
> > GDB are in sync?
> 
> the sim currently duplicates the defines, but it prob should include
> it directly

Oy! I didn't realize that the definitions were duplicated. Yes, indeed,
let's make sure the sim and gdb both use the same defines.

-- 
Joel