[PATCH] Make sure GDB uses a valid shell when starting the inferior and to perform the "shell" command

Sergio Durigan Junior sergiodj@redhat.com
Fri Jul 24 20:35:00 GMT 2015


On Friday, July 24 2015, Paul Koning wrote:

> But if you omit a shell, is the user of that shell blocked from using
> gdb?  That’s not a good failure mode.  It seems to me that omitting a
> non-shell is much more forgiving: all that happens is that you don’t
> get the friendly error message.

As I said before, I agree with this rationale.  However, I just would
like to make it clear that if the shell is invalid, the user will still
be able to start inferiors because GDB will default to /bin/sh.

-- 
Sergio
GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF  31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36
Please send encrypted e-mail if possible
http://sergiodj.net/



More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list