[PATCH] Add proper handling for non-local references in nested functions

Pierre-Marie de Rodat derodat@adacore.com
Tue Aug 25 12:14:00 GMT 2015


On 08/22/2015 01:28 PM, Doug Evans wrote:
> I'd say let's go ahead.
> It's certainly possible I'm seeing the difference due to local
> artifacts. I've tried to rule them out, but TBH I haven't put a whole
> lot of time into it (beyond trying twice in two different trees).
> If someone else isn't seeing them then that's good data.
> I'll play with this a bit more, if it's a local issue
> it'd be good to find out what it is. :-)

Understood. As I said, I'm completely willing to investigate this, but I 
cannot do anything as long as I don't reproduce. ;-)

> LGTM.
> Thanks for the patch!

I just rebased it on master, checked that it builds and regtested it 
another time on x86_64-linux, just to be sure. It's pushed, now. Thank 
you for the review effort!

-- 
Pierre-Marie de Rodat



More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list