[rfc] btrace: change record instruction-history /m

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: "Metzger, Markus T" <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
> CC: "dje@google.com" <dje@google.com>, "palves@redhat.com"
> 	<palves@redhat.com>, "gdb-patches@sourceware.org"
> 	<gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
> Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 06:30:11 +0000
> 
> > So I suggest to tell that in the manual, and in general avoid saying
> > anything as definitive as "in the order they were executed", and
> > instead tell something like "in the order the hardware support for
> > execution tracing collects them".  This at least will point interested
> > readers to the vendor of the hardware if they want to ask specific
> > questions about the order.
> 
> How about "in the order they were recorded"?

Fine with me, but sounds almost trivial, no?