RFC: "set" command with 2 arguments instead of one?

[Joel Brobecker]

> gdb is never going to be at a point where all commands can use buildargv.
> I think choosing either buildargv or commas (using parse_to_comma_and_eval
> or whatever) should consider what the arguments to the command are.
> And since this command takes things that are more like expressions
> than like strings, I'm leaning towards commas.

OK with me.

-- 
Joel