[PATCH 6/7] Implement qXfer:exec-file:read in gdbserver
Doug Evans
xdje42@gmail.com
Mon Apr 6 17:11:00 GMT 2015
Gary Benson <gbenson@redhat.com> writes:
> This commit implements the "qXfer:exec-file:read" packet in gdbserver.
>
> gdb/gdbserver/ChangeLog:
>
> * target.h (struct target_ops) <pid_to_exec_file>: New field.
> * linux-low.c (linux_target_ops): Initialize pid_to_exec_file.
> * server.c (handle_qxfer_exec_file): New function.
> (qxfer_packets): Add exec-file entry.
> (handle_query): Report qXfer:exec-file:read as supported packet.
>
> ...
>
> diff --git a/gdb/gdbserver/target.h b/gdb/gdbserver/target.h
> index 126c861..dc7802d 100644
> --- a/gdb/gdbserver/target.h
> +++ b/gdb/gdbserver/target.h
> @@ -394,6 +394,14 @@ struct target_ops
>
> /* Return true if target supports range stepping. */
> int (*supports_range_stepping) (void);
> +
> + /* Return the pathname of the executable file that was run to
> + create the process PID. If the executable file cannot be
> + determined, NULL is returned. Otherwise, a pointer to a
> + character string containing the pathname is returned. This
> + string should be copied into a buffer by the client if the
> + string will not be immediately used, or if it must persist. */
> + char *(*pid_to_exec_file) (int pid);
> };
>
> extern struct target_ops *the_target;
IWBN to have some clarity on what the pathname result can and cannot be.
Perhaps nitpicky, but the less ambiguity the better.
I think(!) the intent is that the path name is the full
path name, but I could be wrong.
Another issue is whether the path has been real-path'd.
[all symlinks resolved] I don't have a strong opinion on that,
but I do think we should at least require full paths to be returned here.
const char * result?
Also, I was going to say we need to pick a type for "pid" and consistently
use it, but that's a whole 'nother discussion, and this patch set
needn't be bogged down by it.
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list