[PATCH 01/16 v2] Refactor native follow-fork

[Pedro Alves]

On 09/29/2014 07:07 PM, Breazeal, Don wrote:

> The patch is standalone and I believe it has value independent
> of the rest of the series.

Yes, agreed.

> OK to push?

Yes, please push.

> +/* Handle changes to the inferior list based on the type of fork,
> +   which process is being followed, and whether the other process
> +   should be detached.  On entry inferior_ptid must be the ptid of
> +   the fork parent.  At return inferior_ptid is the ptid of the
> +   followed inferior.  */
> +
> +int

'static int' here too.

Consider putting the function above its caller thus avoiding
the need for the other declaration at the top.

> +follow_fork_inferior (int follow_child, int detach_fork)
> +{

Thanks,
Pedro Alves