time to workaround libc/13097 in fsf gdb?

Gary Benson gbenson@redhat.com
Tue Sep 23 13:16:00 GMT 2014

Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 09/20/2014 08:50 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> > Then it is (IMO) most time effective to rewrite GDB to C++
> > first.
> Let me remind you that I'm still on the C++ camp.  Last we
> discussed this, I suggested that we should have a wiki page
> describing the project, summarizing previous discussions,
> previously identified obstacles, proposed solutions for same,
> listing a suggested conversion roadmap ("gcc -Wc++-compat"
> -> "still C but built with g++", etc.), etc.  That hasn't
> happened yet.

This is my fault, it was on my task list and I haven't done



More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list