automated testing comment [Re: time to workaround libc/13097 in fsf gdb?]

Jan Kratochvil
Tue Sep 23 10:59:00 GMT 2014

On Sun, 21 Sep 2014 21:12:17 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 09/20/2014 10:30 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> > But for example kernel-2.6.32-220.el6.x86_64 is "prelinked", see below.
> Ah, didn't know that.  That's the sort of thing we should have in
> comments in the code, or at least in the commit log.

That apparently would not work, comment is added only after the problem is

It would be found by automated testing upon submitting patch for reviews, such
as I have seen done through Jenkins connected to Gerrit.

At least assuming the same "prelinked vDSO" (which is definitely not done by
the prelink program) issue also happens on some non-Fedora/non-RHEL OSes
(as Fedora/RHEL OSes have patched glibc where the vDSO is not listed in the
link map at all and so the patch being discussed is not needed there).

And sure deploying automated testing with the current GDB testsuite as is
would not work now automatically as the testsuite has fuzzy results.  Although
at least running new testcases (from the patch under review) would work which
would be sufficient in this case (but not in other cases - regression cases).


More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list