s/current_inferior/current_thread/ in gdbserver

[Joel Brobecker]

> So we were talking about one quick mechanical change that
> would probably clear things up a lot.  That is,
> s/current_inferior/current_thread/g in gdbserver.
> 
> Any objections to that?

FWIW, no issue with that.

I am also generally in favor of other renamings, even if it likely
involves temporary pain, if it makes things more consistent and
easier to maintain between GDB and GDBserver.

-- 
Joel