[RFC PATCH 0/3] Catch syscall group

Sergio Durigan Junior sergiodj@redhat.com
Sun Oct 12 22:55:00 GMT 2014


On Sunday, October 12 2014, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:

>> I will make comments in the patch itself, but it would be nice if you
>> could do that for the other existing XML files as well.  You didn't
>> mention if you intend to do so or not.
>>
>> I know it will be kind of boring, but unfortunately those XML files are
>> not being really maintained nowadays (a problem I intend to address soon
>> with some patches and proposals), so if you don't touch those files now
>> they will probably be forgotten for quite some time...
>>
>> However, this is just a request, so if you don't have the time to do
>> that now I'd still vote for including this feature on GDB.
>
>  I intend to do so for other architectures, but forgot to mention in my
> original message.  Still, I won't be able to test on some platforms.

The logic will be implemented in the arch-independent part of the code,
so it is reasonable to test only x86* arches.  But I can test on other
architectures if needed.

Cheers,

-- 
Sergio
GPG key ID: 0x65FC5E36
Please send encrypted e-mail if possible
http://sergiodj.net/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 818 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/attachments/20141012/faf56c32/attachment.sig>


More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list