[PATCH 1/9] Decide whether we may have removed breakpoints based on step_over_info

[Yao Qi]

Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> writes:

> I.e., if we have step-over info, then something, somewhere wants a
> breakpoint lifted out of the target.  No matter whether we're
> stepping or continuing the target at this point, we need to receive
> all signals so that if the signal handler calls the code that
> would trigger the breakpoint/watchpoint, we don't miss it.
>
> Removing this check now avoids having tweak it when
> singlestep_breakpoints_inserted_p check global ends up
> eliminated by a later patch in the series.
>
> Does that make sense?

Yes, it makes sense to me.

I've reviewed the rest of patches, and they are good to me.  I've tested
the whole patch set with the changes I suggested in patch 3/9 on
arm-linux-gnueabi target.  No regression.

-- 
Yao (齐尧)