[PATCH v5 09/15] vla: resolve dynamic bounds if value contents is a constant byte-sequence

Agovic, Sanimir sanimir.agovic@intel.com
Wed Mar 19 15:35:00 GMT 2014


Thanks for your review.

> I see. It took me a while to understand what you are saying, but
> I do, now. It's one of these situations where it's almost a shame
> that some case branches return, while others don't, and fallback
> on something that happens to take care of dynamicity. Oh well, I have
> no better proposal at the moment, so the current approach is fine
> with me.
> 
> Question for you:  Shouldn't we be doing the same for LOC_CONST?
> 
Good catch, indeed we should. I have updated the patch to cover
LOC_CONST and added a test-case as well. Thanks again.

 -Sanimir

Intel GmbH
Dornacher Strasse 1
85622 Feldkirchen/Muenchen, Deutschland
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Feldkirchen bei Muenchen
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Christian Lamprechter, Hannes Schwaderer, Douglas Lusk
Registergericht: Muenchen HRB 47456
Ust.-IdNr./VAT Registration No.: DE129385895
Citibank Frankfurt a.M. (BLZ 502 109 00) 600119052



More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list