[pushed] Don't suppress errors inserting/removing hardware breakpoints in shared libraries.
Yao Qi
yao@codesourcery.com
Fri Jun 6 09:00:00 GMT 2014
On 06/06/2014 04:40 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 06/06/2014 04:08 AM, Yao Qi wrote:
>> On 06/06/2014 12:01 AM, Pedro Alves wrote:
>>> Yes, but no need to match by target, we can do like e.g.,
>>> gdb.base/signull.exp does, and check whether "x /b 0" manages
>>> to read memory. If so, then skip the test. Any sane target with
>>> an MMU will leave page 0 unmapped, so no need to look for some other
>>> address.
>>
>> How about the patch below?
>>
>
> OK. Thanks!
>
Thanks for the review. Patch is pushed in.
--
Yao (é½å°§)
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list