[PATCH] Delete struct inferior_suspend_state

[Doug Evans]

On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Jan Kratochvil
<jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I do not mind any way.
>
> But in the case it is deleted I believe it is better to keep there at least
> comments at the places where is currently #if 0.  So if one is adding a new
> field one immediately knows where it should belong - to the 4 cases of 2x2
> matrix {thread,inferior}_{suspend,control}_state - in the case it would belong
> to the inferior+suspend combination.

Thanks.

If we're going to keep comments we might as well keep the #if 0'd code
(which is fine by me).
There's no real difference between the two, and the #if 0'd out code
is more descriptive, though I would add a commit (tweak a comment?) so
that the next person will more easily know that the #if 0's are ok.
IWBN to have examples where #if 0 is at least not a bad thing.