[PATCH] DWARFv5 DW_TAG_aligned_type.
Thu Jul 17 22:36:00 GMT 2014
Forgot to ask...
On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 00:19 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-07-11 at 07:42 -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > My only question is regarding the checks for alignments to be stricter
> > than the alignment of their base types. Why are they needed? I am asking
> > because, in Ada, it is allowed to be specifying an alignment which is
> > less strict than the standard alignment. We can ask for byte-aligned
> > integers, for instance.
Could you post an example Ada source code example so I can test a bit
how my gcc and gdb patches interact for an user aligned Ada type?
More information about the Gdb-patches