[PATCH] sim/microblaze/interp.c: Use long int format instead of int to avoid compiling warnings
Michael Eager
eager@eagercon.com
Tue Jul 1 01:11:00 GMT 2014
On 06/30/14 18:07, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 07/01/2014 08:43 AM, Michael Eager wrote:
>> On 06/30/14 17:14, Chen Gang wrote:
>>> The related warnings (cross compile microblaze-linux-elf):
>>>
>>> ../../../binutils-gdb/sim/microblaze/interp.c: In function
>>> ‘microblaze_extract_unsigned_integer’:
>>> ../../../binutils-gdb/sim/microblaze/interp.c:53:6: warning: format
>>> ‘%d’ expects argument of type ‘int’, but argument 2 has type ‘long
>>> unsigned int’ [-Wformat]
>>> ../../../binutils-gdb/sim/microblaze/interp.c: In function ‘sim_size’:
>>> ../../../binutils-gdb/sim/microblaze/interp.c:329:4: warning:
>>> format ‘%d’ expects argument of type ‘int’, but argument 3 has type
>>> ‘long unsigned int’ [-Wformat]
>>> ../../../binutils-gdb/sim/microblaze/interp.c: In function
>>> ‘set_initial_gprs’:
>>> ../../../binutils-gdb/sim/microblaze/interp.c:360:7: warning:
>>> format ‘%d’ expects argument of type ‘int’, but argument 3 has type
>>> ‘long unsigned int’ [-Wformat]
>>> ../../../binutils-gdb/sim/microblaze/interp.c:360:7: warning:
>>> format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 4
>>> has type ‘long unsigned int’ [-Wformat]
>>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> sim/ChangeLog | 5 +++++
>>> sim/microblaze/interp.c | 6 +++---
>>> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/sim/ChangeLog b/sim/ChangeLog
>>> index 35d0920..03c244b 100644
>>> --- a/sim/ChangeLog
>>> +++ b/sim/ChangeLog
>>> @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
>>> +2014-07-01 Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
>>> +
>>> + * sim/microblaze/interp.c: Use long int format instead of int
>>> + format to avoid compiling warnings.
>>> +
>>> 2014-03-12 Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
>>>
>>> * MAINTAINERS: Add myself as the maintainer for the MSP430.
>>
>> Please put your ChangeLog in the email, not in a patch.
>
> OK, thanks. I shall notice about it next time. If necessary to send
> patch v2 for it, please let me know.
>
>>
>>> diff --git a/sim/microblaze/interp.c b/sim/microblaze/interp.c
>>> index cc61278..e92a1d0 100644
>>> --- a/sim/microblaze/interp.c
>>> +++ b/sim/microblaze/interp.c
>>> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ microblaze_extract_unsigned_integer (unsigned char
>>> *addr, int len)
>>>
>>> if (len > (int) sizeof (unsigned long))
>>> printf ("That operation is not available on integers of more than "
>>> - "%d bytes.", sizeof (unsigned long));
>>> + "%ld bytes.", sizeof (unsigned long));
>>>
>>> /* Start at the most significant end of the integer, and work towards
>>> the least significant. */
>>> @@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ sim_size (int size)
>>> {
>>> if (issue_messages)
>>> fprintf (stderr,
>>> - "Not enough VM for simulation of %d bytes of RAM\n",
>>> + "Not enough VM for simulation of %ld bytes of RAM\n",
>>> CPU.msize);
>>>
>>> CPU.msize = 1;
>>> @@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ set_initial_gprs ()
>>> memsize = CPU.msize / (1024 * 1024);
>>>
>>> if (issue_messages > 1)
>>> - fprintf (stderr, "Simulated memory of %d Mbytes (0x0 .. 0x%08x)\n",
>>> + fprintf (stderr, "Simulated memory of %ld Mbytes (0x0 ..
>>> 0x%08lx)\n",
>>> memsize, CPU.msize - 1);
>>>
>>> /* Clean out the GPRs */
>>
>>
>> Commit ba8e7d1e2.
>
> Excuse me, I do not quite undersand the meaning. I guess it means:
>
> "have applied this patch, and its' commit number is ba8e7d1e2...",
That's correct. The patch has been committed as an obvious fix.
--
Michael Eager eager@eagercon.com
1960 Park Blvd., Palo Alto, CA 94306 650-325-8077
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list