[PATCH] Change len's type to ULONGEST: remote_write_bytes_aux

Pedro Alves palves@redhat.com
Thu Jan 23 14:37:00 GMT 2014


On 01/22/2014 12:56 PM, Yao Qi wrote:

> AFAICS, the target layer is a boundary.  In one side, we pass size_t
> or ssize_t to target related APIs, and in the other side, the
> implementation side, we used LONGEST (ULONGEST in latest code) because
> of to_xfer_partial.
> 
> Since remote_write_bytes_aux and remote_write_bytes belong to the
> implementation of remote target, we should use ULONGEST for len, IMO.
> 
> Regression tested on x86_64-linux.  Is it OK?

This is fine with me.

-- 
Pedro Alves



More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list