[PATCH] gdb: xtensa: fix build

Pedro Alves palves@redhat.com
Fri Jan 17 13:07:00 GMT 2014


On 01/16/2014 08:27 PM, Baruch Siach wrote:
> Hi Maxim,
> 
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:11:41PM -0800, Maxim Grigoriev wrote:
>> Hello Pedro and Baruch,
>>
>> I actually haven't been doing Xtensa GDB maintenance for quite some time
>> now since I left Tensilica.
> 
> Since xtensa-linux-nat.c used PTRACE_GETXTREGS since the beginning, and since 
> sys/ptrace.h (at least on uClibc) never defined this value, the question is 
> simply how did you build gdb at the time?
> 
> I should note that Buildroot is carrying this patch for more than a year now.

Alright.  Indeed, the original submission left me wondering whether
the "We" in "We need" might even be talking about a different libc
than what the original port was done against (if not, weird that this
didn't come up then), and if so, then I have to wonder whether
just switching to asm/ptrace.h might be breaking the build against
other libc (glibc?), and therefore we might need to include both.
So mainly I'm just looking for a little more confirmation and
more extended description for the commit log / archives.

-- 
Pedro Alves



More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list