small request regarding commits in binutils-gdb.git

[Mike Frysinger]

On Wednesday 15 January 2014 14:48:51 Fred Cooke wrote:
> I'd be with you, Mike, but these packages are regularly distributed
> without source control, as tarballs, and as such it's useful.

i don't think it is, but let's assume you're right.  there's no reason the 
dist steps can't autogenerate a full ChangeLog from git history and throw it 
into the tarball.  it's what other GNU projects are doing now (like 
coreutils).
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/attachments/20140115/c206bfdb/attachment.sig>