[PATCH 0/2] GDB process record and reverse debugging improvements for arm*-linux*

[Omair Javaid]

On 20 December 2013 17:38, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 11/24/2013 11:48 PM, Omair Javaid wrote:
>
>> After incorporating all suggestions I am posting a final version of all
>> three patches posted earlier. Looking for a go ahead for commit.
>
> All three emails in the series have the same subject apart from
> the numbers, which make it confusing.  It'd be good if you made
> sure the subjects were actually different, and more specific,
> in the git commit log.
>
> Hmm, I'm also surprised to now find that this "0/2" email
> actually contains a patch.  That makes it actually 3 patches
> in the series.  This is not the standard de facto way to
> send a series.  The best way is for 0 to be the series intro,
> with no patch, and then have the patches be replies to the
> intro mail.  (I'd suggest addressing the comments I just
> sent to patches #1 and #2, and resend the whole series with
> git send-mail, which does that for you automatically.)
>
>>
>> == PATCH 0 ==
>>
>> This patch adds a news entry about improved process record-replay on
>> arm*-linux* targets.
>> It also adds linux-record.o to gdb_target_obs in configure.tgt and
>> enables gdb.reverse testsuite for arm*-linux* targets.
>
> These could be two separate patches, with NEWS actually being the
> last patch in the whole series.
>
>> gdb/testsuite:
>>
>> 2013-10-24  Omair Javaid  <omair.javaid@linaro.org>
>>
>>       * lib/gdb.exp: Enable gdb.reverse testsuite for arm*-linux* targets.
>
> Write:
>
>         * lib/gdb.exp (supports_process_record): Return true for arm*-linux*.
>
> Otherwise looks good.
>
> --
> Pedro Alves
>

Suggestions to all previous patches have been incorporated and a patch
series has been sent using git send-email here:

https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-01/msg00011.html

Kindly suggest if they are good enough to be committed.