[PATCH 06/12] Use varobj_is_dynamic_p more widely
Yao Qi
yao@codesourcery.com
Fri Feb 14 08:46:00 GMT 2014
Use varobj_is_dynamic_p more widely so that the callers of
varobj_is_dynamic_p are unchanged when we add available-children-only
stuff in varobj_is_dynamic_p.
gdb:
2014-02-14 Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
* varobj.c (varobj_get_num_children): Call
varobj_is_dynamic_p.
(varobj_list_children): Likewise.
(varobj_update): Likewise. Update comments.
---
gdb/varobj.c | 11 +++++------
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/varobj.c b/gdb/varobj.c
index 66596b5..8905087 100644
--- a/gdb/varobj.c
+++ b/gdb/varobj.c
@@ -895,7 +895,7 @@ varobj_get_num_children (struct varobj *var)
{
if (var->num_children == -1)
{
- if (var->dynamic->pretty_printer != NULL)
+ if (varobj_is_dynamic_p (var))
{
int dummy;
@@ -922,7 +922,7 @@ varobj_list_children (struct varobj *var, int *from, int *to)
var->dynamic->children_requested = 1;
- if (var->dynamic->pretty_printer != NULL)
+ if (varobj_is_dynamic_p (var))
{
/* This, in theory, can result in the number of children changing without
frontend noticing. But well, calling -var-list-children on the same
@@ -1715,10 +1715,9 @@ varobj_update (struct varobj **varp, int explicit)
}
}
- /* We probably should not get children of a varobj that has a
- pretty-printer, but for which -var-list-children was never
- invoked. */
- if (v->dynamic->pretty_printer != NULL)
+ /* We probably should not get children of a dynamic varobj, but
+ for which -var-list-children was never invoked. */
+ if (varobj_is_dynamic_p (v))
{
VEC (varobj_p) *changed = 0, *type_changed = 0, *unchanged = 0;
VEC (varobj_p) *new = 0;
--
1.7.7.6
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list