gdbreplay not installed

[Mike Frysinger]

On Thursday, February 06, 2014 18:04:32 Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 02/06/2014 01:34 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Thursday, February 06, 2014 14:50:36 Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >> I noticed that gdbreplay is built, but not installed by "make
> >> install".  Is that on purpose?
> > 
> > previous discussion:
> > https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-12/msg00915.html
> > https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-01/msg00002.html
> > 
> > oh gawd, has it really been 2 years already ...
> 
> I won't object to installing it if turns out multiple people
> do want it installed, but I have to say I have trouble
> figuring out _who_ but maintainers (and integrators doing
> their own maintenance) would want it.

sorry, i meant "i can't believe i vividly recalled a conversation that 
happened 2 years ago" not "wtf haven't you merged a patch that's 2 years old".

i think your qualification is accurate as to the target audience.  i wanted it 
at the time for my own debug work and instinctively reached to have it 
installed.  i don't think there's a wider group of people clamouring for it.
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/attachments/20140206/b0f1a4c2/attachment.sig>